View this email in your browser
Dear Jack,

Political change unfolds in three stages.  First, when a new idea comes along, they will say that reform is unthinkable. 
 
Then as the idea starts to take hold, opponents admit that it might be a good idea after all, but it is unfortunately impractical.  Finally, at the third stage they will tell you it was their idea all along.
 
School choice, the idea that we give families control over their child’s education tax dollars, is no longer unthinkable.  Several states, including our neighbor, Arkansas give each child an Education Freedom Account, into which the state pays about $8,000 – 10,000 each year. 
 
Mom and dad are then able to allocate that money to either a public, private or church school of their choice.  They are even allowed to use the funds to home school their kids.  School choice is now a reality in half a dozen states across America. 
 
Listen to Corey DeAngelis explain how such a system would work in Mississippi.
One practical objection we are starting to hear is that school choice will not work in rural areas that only have one available local school.
 
Surely a lack of options is a reason to extend choice, not to limit it?  If there is only a single school available, all the more important that we allow families to use some of their children’s tax dollars to pay for additional tutoring, or some alternative lessons, on top.      
 
Others object to school choice on the grounds that it would defund public education. Allowing families to choose their grocery store does not ‘defund’ Walmart.  Allowing families to choose their school does not ‘defund’ public schools. 
 
Since when did those tax dollars belong to the school board bureaucracy?  Our tax dollars are there to educate our children.  School choice would give every family the opportunity to choose what is best for their children. 
 
When opponents of parent power claim that giving families control over the money would mean less money for school board bureaucrats, they are making an important admission.  They are acknowledging that if they were able to, some families would chose something different. 
 
Over the coming months, we will hear all kinds of practical excuses advanced against parent power.  Do not be discouraged.  Those citing practical objections against parent power are doing so because they have had to abandon any principled opposition. 
Forward this email to a friend!
Warm regards,


Douglas Carswell
President & CEO
 
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Mississippi Center for Public Policy
520 George St
Jackson, MS 39202-3013

Add us to your address book


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.


Copyright © 2023 Mississippi Center for Public Policy, All rights reserved.