Good morning,

The Alamo fell on March 6, 1836. Shouts of “Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad!” inspired our forefathers to fight for self-governance in Texas. Ancient Israel had its own, inverse version of the Alamo, which I reflect on below.

But, as it turns out, the simmering fight over the Alamo leads today's Texas Minute.

– Michael Quinn Sullivan 

Friday, March 6, 2020
Update your email preferences.

• Land Commissioner George P. Bush has “wasted significant public dollars on designs which most Texans would immediately reject,” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said yesterday of his Republican colleague’s oversight of the Alamo. Mr. Bush has not responded to our requests for a comment.
      
• As Brandon Waltens reports, Bush has long received criticism – largely from conservative Texans – over the General Land Office and the City of San Antonio’s plan to “reimagine” the site of the Alamo. Most contentious has been a push from some quarters to de-emphasize the 1836 battle.
     
• “The job of oversight for [the Alamo] is the responsibility of the General Land Office headed by Commissioner George P. Bush. It is evident to me that both the design, planning, and execution of the project is badly off track.” – Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick
      
• Some observers see in Patrick’s rhetorical punches the early shots in what is rumored to be a brewing 2022 GOP primary challenge from Bush.
         
• More than 97 percent of Texas Republicans agreed with the ballot question that the state “should protect and preserve all historical monuments, artifacts, and buildings, such as the Alamo Cenotaph and our beloved Alamo, and should oppose any reimagining of the Alamo site.”
      
• That was one of 10 questions at the end the GOP ballot – essentially an opinion poll of those who participated in the primary. For example, 1,991,173 Republicans cast votes on the “Alamo” question noted above – with 1,937,845 voting “yes.” Put another way, more Republicans voted to protect the Alamo than to re-nominate President Trump (1.88 million).
   
• Cary Cheshire summarizes the rest of the GOP ballot questions, including the fact 94.3 percent of Republicans want a complete ban on taxpayer-funded lobbying – an initiative killed in the Texas House by Republican and Democrat lawmakers in 2019.

Friday Reflection

by Michael Quinn Sullivan

Before my first trip to Israel, friends told me Masada would be my favorite stop – “It’s Israel’s Alamo!” they would say. It’s a beautiful place, overlooking the Dead Sea to the east. The innovative architecture made it all but impenetrable. And, yes, there are striking parallels to the Alamo. 

Masada was a remote and massive fortress built by Herod the Great, designed to sustain its occupants for a long time even in the face of an entrenched enemy. The comparison to the Alamo isn’t completely wrong. At Masada, the vastly outnumbered “good guys” held out against superior forces. And, of course, all the good guys in both stories eventually died when the superior force made it in.

Similar, but you have to do a lot of squinting to make Masada into the Alamo. Where the Alamo came at the beginning of Texas' War of Independence, Masada was the final blow to the Jewish Great Revolt (A.D. 66-73).

The Jewish Zealots, who dreamed of political independence from the Romans, had been fighting for six years when Masada became their last stand. Built on the top of a plateau similar to an American mesa, nearly 1,000 Jews were able to hold out against 15,000 Roman forces.

Over the course of several months, the Romans built a massive siege ramp – still visible today as are the outlines of the legionaries’ camps – which they used to march up to Masada’s walls.

While the Texans at the Alamo fought the advancing Mexicans to the death, the Jewish rebels took their own lives before the Romans could enter.

The Roman historian Josephus, a former Jewish general, wrote that the zealots preferred to take their own lives rather than be paraded around as a conquered people. The Alamo defenders, you will recall, were told they would die unless they surrendered. 

There was a lot of death at Masada and the Alamo, but with big differences. One group became a footnote in the history of Roman conquest, the other inspired and mobilized a people to defeat what was the greatest military power in the hemisphere.

By choosing suicide at Masada, the Jewish rebels spared themselves the personal embarrassment of being conquered, but that did little good for their fellow countrymen left suffering under a heavy Roman yoke. For those zealots, death was not a sacrifice made to the benefit of others, it was the prideful way out.

In choosing to fight, knowing their own death was all but inevitable, the Alamo defenders hoped to inspire their countrymen to fight a tyrannical and murderous regime. The Alamo defenders sacrificed themselves for the cause of liberty.

The lesson I have taken from Masada and the Alamo is that my obligation isn’t to be victorious, but to be faithful. Despite the odds, despite the peril, despite the risk, we must keep fighting.