View this email in your browser ([link removed])
Dear Jack,

There has been some good news about school choice in our state. First, Mississippi’s Authoriser Board approved our state’s first charter high school, Clarksdale Collegiate Prep.

Then on SuperTalk this week, both the Lieutenant Governor, Delbert Hosemann, and future House Speaker, Jason White, sounded wonderfully upbeat about school choice. Delbert Hosemann even said he expected to see “multiple school choice bills” presented during the 2024 state legislative session. Three cheers!

[link removed]
Had enough of ‘woke’ ideology? Then you might enjoy a video that skewers this dull, sterile, humorless dogma - and if you like it, pass it on!

However, the Lieutenant Governor also introduced a note of caution, suggesting that such reforms may have to be restricted in their scope. Why? Because he said, under Mississippi’s constitution “you can’t put government money into private schools”.

The Lieutenant Governor raises an important point. As the case for universal school choice becomes increasingly difficult to ignore, we need to examine what Mississippi’s constitution actually says. Does our state constitution really preclude Mississippi from implementing Arkansas-type reform?

Section 208 of the Mississippi Constitution states that:

“No religious or other sect or sects shall ever control any part of the school or other educational funds of this state; nor shall any funds be appropriated toward the support of any sectarian school, or to any school that at the time of receiving such appropriation is not conducted as a free school.”

It could not be clearer, opponents of school choice will say. No public money can be appropriated for private schools.

Except, of course, with Arkansas-type school choice, public money is not appropriated for private schools. It is appropriated to families, who receive 90 percent of the prior year’s net public school aid budget paid into their child’s Education Freedom Account. This they can then spend on a school of their choice, public, private or home school.

Claiming that under such a scheme money is being appropriated to private schools would be like claiming that part of your wages are being appropriated to Target, simply because you chose to spend some of your salary there.
Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders has made school choice happen.
The argument that Mississippi’s constitution prevents universal school choice is not a slam dunk after all.

In his interview on SuperTalk, the Lieutenant Governor was also quite right to refer to a case currently before the courts concerning the use of pandemic relief funds paid to private schools.

During Covid, large sums of federal money were provided to states like Mississippi to distribute to eligible recipients for disaster relief and to spur economic recovery. The Mississippi legislature, in turn, authorized a state agency to distribute about $10 million of those federal funds to private schools for infrastructure improvements.

This prompted a legal challenge brought by the activist group Parents for Public Schools, who argued that Section 208 made such payments unconstitutional. A Hinds County chancellor agreed. The Mississippi Supreme Court is now reviewing the case on appeal.

What if the Supreme Court rules that it was unconstitutional to give $10 million of pandemic relief funds to private schools? Would that mean Arkansas-type school choice is now considered unconstitutional in our state, as Mr. Hosemann seemed to imply?

Not at all. In fact, our legal division, the Mississippi Justice Institute, led by the brilliant Aaron Rice, recently addressed that very question in the pandemic relief litigation. Teaming up with our friends at the Institute for Justice, we filed a “friend of the court” brief with the Mississippi Supreme Court to ensure the point was clear.

Aaron Rice, Mississippi Justice Institute

Here is what we told the Court.

Even if the Court ruled that the provision of $10 million in federal relief funds to private schools was unconstitutional, that decision would not prevent Mississippi from enacting school choice programs, including those available to families using non-public schools.

Why not? Because the Mississippi Constitution only prohibits the appropriation of state education dollars for institutional aid to non-public schools. It does not prevent the state from providing individual aid to students who choose to use those funds for tuition at non-public schools. Indeed, to avoid future confusion on that point, we asked the Court to explicitly say so in its ruling.

Moreover, as our legal brief points out, it is not just the text of the Constitution on our side. Precedent from the Mississippi Supreme Court supports our view as well. Over 80 years ago, the Court decided Chance v. Mississippi State Textbook Rating & Purchasing Board, 200 So. 706 (Miss., 1941). In that case, the Court upheld a law that appropriated funds to purchase textbooks and distribute them to students, including those in non-public schools. Why? Because the program was designed to benefit the students, not the schools.

Far from precluding school choice, Mississippi’s constitutional law is favourable to it.

There are plenty of legitimate (if misguided) arguments against having universal school choice in Mississippi. Claiming that the Mississippi Constitution prevents it is not one of them.

Have a wonderful weekend!
Forward this email to a friend! ([link removed])

Warm regards,

Douglas Carswell
President & CEO

============================================================
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Mississippi Center for Public Policy
520 George St
Jackson, MS 39202-3013
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Copyright © 2023 Mississippi Center for Public Policy, All rights reserved.